Meeting and operations automation
Meeting notes turned into assigned tasks and drafted recaps, released only after a person approves.
Start with the job someone on your team retypes every week. Rebuild that one, measure it, then decide what comes next.
Built for teams of 5 to 100 that are tired of retyping. Every launch price is listed below.
Start with the work people describe as "I just copy it over." The same customer details typed into two or three systems. Notes that have to become tasks in a project tool. Emails someone reads, sorts, and answers with numbers pulled from another screen. Those jobs follow rules and happen every week. They quietly eat hours nobody budgets for.
Leave the judgment calls alone for now: pricing a deal, giving advice, deciding who to hire. In every build here, a person stays in charge of anything financial, legal, employment-related, or customer-facing. The automation drafts and routes. Your team approves.
Raquel scopes every project, writes the spec, and stays your contact through the 30-day review. A contracted technical delivery partner builds to the spec Raquel writes and reviews.
Meeting notes turned into assigned tasks and drafted recaps, released only after a person approves.
One manual process, such as client intake, rebuilt end to end and measured against its old self.
An agent that reads incoming requests and prepares the reply for your team to check and send.
Your customer list lives in three places with three spellings? Cleaning comes before any automation.
Written rules on client data should exist before a workflow starts moving it between systems.
When one team needs several connected builds, the work is scoped as a department project.
Every build here records a baseline first, so the 30-day review compares real numbers, not impressions.
Free, about four minutes, and read by Raquel herself.